Flight 175 - Impossible speed

Back



Here is a clip confirming what Joseph Keith had already established, That flight 175 could not have possibly travelled anywhere near 500 MPH at 700ft altitude. Verified by Boeing spokeswoman Leslie Hazzard and Boeing engineer Lori Bechtold. http://www.pumpitout.com - -

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: September 21, 2007 at 8:22 pm
Author: pumpitout

Length: 0:06:25
Rating: 4.43
Views: 64,728

Tags: 911 wtc flight 175 september 11

Video Thumbnail #1:




Video Thumbnail #2:




Video Thumbnail #3:




Video Url:


Embed Code:


Video Comments:
chrisswansea2 (Tuesday 18th of November 2008 06:23:35 AM)
Yep, and that would affect safe cruising speed. True. But these guys were going for it and if you take into account the dive that increased the speed then you have it. The impact those planes had on those buildings, they could have been doing half the speed and still entered the walls.
machfron (Tuesday 18th of November 2008 02:20:27 AM)
The air is three times as dense at 1000 feet when compared to typical cruising altitudes.
guitmarc54 (Monday 17th of November 2008 04:38:58 PM)
Wake up fellow stupid Americans! 9/11 was an inside job! We elected obama, big deal, he is not the solution, but a placebo...reinvestigate 9/11! We must demand the governmet to reexamine the facts... all the facts... dont let this become another JFK cover up!
chrisswansea2 (Monday 17th of November 2008 02:33:29 PM)
There's that word again, naive. Limited vocabulary on display here. No, I don't swallow what the media chucks out. Watching it live was enogh for me. Sweeping generalisations are too easy. Being jealous of lots of friends? Where you also jealous of people who got laid before you too?
bweazel (Monday 17th of November 2008 02:22:34 PM)
susceptible to conspiracy theories? is that something you're proud of? that's pretty funny you say it like that though. I think it's pretty easy to flip that around and say people that trust everything they hear and see, have too many friends to keep count of, and naive are most at risk to actually trust the bullshit the corporate media says. but hey. agree to disagree right? i also like that saying, 85% of statistics are made up on the spot : )
chrisswansea2 (Monday 17th of November 2008 02:15:45 PM)
Naive is word batted around on here a lot. Really it just comes down to not being susceptible to conspiracy theories. Psychological tests show people who are untrusting, have few friends, are gullible and lack a place in society are most at risk. But hey, that's probably misinformation too. Russia by the way is proposing to drill under the arctic to position itself when the middle east starts to run dry.
bweazel (Monday 17th of November 2008 02:06:49 PM)
i'm sure to you, it's about as fun as being willfully ignorant and naive. oh don't forget too prideful to say you've been duped. : ] nuking disney land. haha. ya! fuck mickey! Real oil in russia's hands? hmmm. where'd you get that info?
chrisswansea2 (Monday 17th of November 2008 02:03:36 PM)
How about nuking Disneyland. The real oil is in Russian hands now anyway, and the gas for that matter. Shame the US has already played they're trump card with WTC. No war with Russia then. Wow, this making stuff up is fun. Can see why you guys do it.
bweazel (Monday 17th of November 2008 12:46:59 PM)
and no one is talking about the x-files or the matrix. i know the world is painful. so don't preach to me. you are naive and some day you'll wake up to that fact. so please. other than, the statue of liberty, what other way could you get an apathetic country, to FULLY support an invasion of afghanistan and iraq, don't forget it also needs to be something painful enough to usher in a new era of diminishing civil liberties AND painful enough that american's won't care if you stay in iraq for good.
bweazel (Monday 17th of November 2008 12:42:07 PM)
hahaha. ok man. if you say so. is that the best you could do? terrorists destroy the statue of liberty and america wants REVENGE. haha. sure sure. somehow i don't think that would have the affect required. remember your history. 2000+ die on the lusitania, america goes to war, 2000+ die at pearl harbor, america goes to war, 2000+ die on 9/11, america goes to war. starting to see a pattern? our government may have not set all these up, but they sure didn't do much to stop them.