Neil Cavuto and Bill O'Reilly Get VERY HEATED
BackI am sure the O 'Reilly hating socialists will love this interview
Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: September 16, 2008 at 7:11 pm
Author: sallee5
Length: 0:06:41
Rating: 4.67
Views: 61,853
Tags: cavuto bill o'reilly fox news economy wall street oil economics
Video Comments:
jjrglobal (Monday 17th of November 2008 09:45:45 PM)
1997 oil was $12 Bbl. It costs my company $15 Bbl to get it out of the ground. Why do you think there were so many oil companies that went out of business in the 80's? Because they were making so much money?
jjrglobal (Monday 17th of November 2008 09:43:53 PM)
The system broke down because of government intervention into the free market. Had their not been an explicit guarantee by the federal government to back the mortgages of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, investors would not have bought them. They would have insisted that the lending standards be changed before they purchased the MBS's
shroomingnewman (Monday 17th of November 2008 05:09:59 PM)
o reilly is such a moron. he says there was no one in govt was saying what was coming? ron paul has been talking about this for years now. people just chose not to listen.
shroomingnewman (Monday 17th of November 2008 04:59:29 PM)
oh come on
quest8899 (Monday 17th of November 2008 08:43:02 AM)
Neil Cavuto only cares about the rich.
david7k (Sunday 16th of November 2008 10:28:28 PM)
when have oil comp ever lost money?bills right,your mans a jack ass.
vtc31 (Sunday 16th of November 2008 08:49:18 AM)
class A dick head!!
clipper782 (Friday 14th of November 2008 02:50:57 PM)
Fox news anchors gone wild!
XdaymanX (Friday 14th of November 2008 10:27:16 AM)
Since when is the President a financial analyst or an investment advisor? If Bush should have known that these companies were going to tank, then wouldn't every market analyst and advisor have this information before him, considering it's their job to know? I usually never miss an opportunity to bash bush, but that's a little out there. His policies may be to blame, but to say he knew it was coming and decided not to say anything is pretty ridiculous!!!
malucao255 (Wednesday 12th of November 2008 06:13:09 AM)
How can people think that leaving up to the private companies is a better solution?? What would you prefer: Major entities should be run by a government, that even with its problems, is based on democracy, where at least the people have some input OR private companies where the main goal is to maximize profits and fulfil the greedy dreams of some in the board and investors??
-
Pages:
Home
-
Popular Artists
Avril Lavigne
Babyface
Beyonce
Britney Spears
Destinys Child
Eminem
Jay-Z
Jessica Simpson
Madonna
Mariah Carey
Shakira
Usher
Stevie Wonder