Lyrics

Ecsed (Thursday 30th of October 2008 04:48:50 AM)

Visual Studio is for the non-inspired programmers who want to make horrible code for horrible companies and don't plan on getting a bachelors or a masters. BCB is for people who get masters/PHD's and end up actually becoming programmers... Not just codemonkeys writing repetitive and useless code. Also, It is a very good thing to know both... But, as far as specialization and actual usage... BCB owns the crap out of anything from microsoft tbh.

ElOrnitorrinco (Wednesday 15th of October 2008 10:34:55 PM)

I came here because I'm learning Jahshaka, but I have taken a couple programming classes... And I am positive that "high-energy" and "C++ builder" do not belong in the same sentence. =D

P47RICK (Friday 18th of July 2008 12:49:56 PM)

MFC is not that slow if you set the right compiler options

SoPhoda (Thursday 10th of July 2008 03:37:01 PM)

What's RAD ???

P47RICK (Friday 18th of July 2008 12:48:43 PM)

Rapid application development.

0cton (Wednesday 28th of May 2008 06:55:24 AM)

visual basic was good I can even say great for GUI's but not that good unfortunatelly for writing code that does something effective and fast, possible but not as easy as c++ fr example a perfect language would be Visual python lol XD of course without a widget toolkit and with a real compiler :P

Intelext (Saturday 5th of April 2008 06:05:24 AM)

Borland compiler > Microsoft compiler

bernardje (Monday 4th of February 2008 05:08:56 AM)

i'm using visual studio but i am not busy with c++ i use visual basic now :P

spider853 (Tuesday 22nd of January 2008 01:13:15 PM)

+1. I Think That Microsoft's Visual C++ is Much Buggy Than Borland's ... But... is Smaller.. :(

thelittlealien (Tuesday 22nd of January 2008 12:00:05 PM)

Stick with Visual Studio if you want a job.