PIMPIN TURTLE Confronts Sen. Joe Lieberman on WTC-7 & 9/11

Back



http://pimpinturtle.com August 7, 2008 PIMPINTURTLE.COM confronts Senator Joe Lieberman, during his campaign for John McCain, about World Trade Center building 7... and asks if he would be willing to support a new investigation into 9/11. EDIT: Everything that you see in this video is exactly as it happened. Nothing has been removed from Senator Lieberman's response. The only editing that was done was the addition of the WTC 7 collapse footage, following the Senator's remark, "I have no evidence that this really occurred." Immediately after the footage of the WTC 7 collapse the dialogue continues in its original order, exactly from where it left off. In other words, this video was not edited to make it look as if he said something he did not. NONE OF SENATOR LIEBERMAN'S COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION PROPOSED HAVE BEEN EDITED OUT!

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: August 7, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Author: 7834qgrwhuiadfilsh89

Length: 0:02:54
Rating: 4.89
Views: 16,433

Tags: wtc 9/11 conspiracy joe lieberman senator confronts commission report bush pimpin turtle building world trade center

Video Thumbnail #1:




Video Thumbnail #2:




Video Thumbnail #3:




Video Url:


Embed Code:


Video Comments:
Gilgamesh73 (Wednesday 5th of November 2008 12:32:15 PM)
Thourough!? You have got to be kidding me. Watch the new footage of the WTC7 collapse on my channel--released November 1, 2008.
hotlittledago (Thursday 16th of October 2008 12:42:57 AM)
As soon as ONE person gives me a LOGICAL explanation as to why the media only showed ONE video of the Pentagon getting hit, then I'll believe Bush. Until then, believe it was for the good of the country. (Oh, and you can't say that there weren't any other videos- unless you think that the PENTAGON isn't COMPLETELY under surveillance. Because...well, it is. the only video we saw shows us a nano second of a white flash and then an explosion.) Ok, someone argue with that, NO spin (copy n paste!)
emanxavier (Thursday 16th of October 2008 12:31:31 AM)
song bird McCain
jesusgrc1762 (Sunday 12th of October 2008 11:08:06 AM)
Let me ask you, what do you think about the questions/points I raised in both Part 1 & 2? Are they not important to look into?
0zachNJDparise9 (Monday 13th of October 2008 09:34:06 AM)
Well if they were important enough then they would of been looked into by the leftest media. They try as hard as they can to smash Bush as much as they can. Most of the internet sources are just conspiracy websites. Do you know how many people have to keep this a secret? And no one cracked? This is another website- thebestpage inthe universe. net / c. cgi? u= 911_ morons. It also has a link at the bottom that has a LOOSE CHANGE guide. I want to raise a question too. Who attacked us in 1993?
jesusgrc1762 (Monday 13th of October 2008 10:11:46 AM)
It's been looked into by many. The fact that it's still being discussed says a lot for the validity of the official story. If u'd bothered to read my previous posts (Questions PArt1 & Coincidences PART 2), u'd see that none of these have ever been answered. You can't deny the questions raised by engineers, physicists and architects as well as the international community. It has nothing to do with leftist media. But more to do with those in control of it.
jesusgrc1762 (Monday 13th of October 2008 10:17:32 AM)
And if you knew ur history, u'd know that govts have always used false flag opts to incite wars. The questions I raised before have been documented but not answered. If you believe everyone is so innocent, then why don't you ask urself why they haven't answered them. After all, it shouldn't be too difficult to answer and put an end to this endless speculation. Not too much to ask considering the subject.
jesusgrc1762 (Sunday 12th of October 2008 10:25:19 AM)
"I also want to know why the Questions PArt1 you posted wasn't looked into by the total Anti-Bush media." Well, if you look on the internet, talk to people, watch alternative sources other than trash corp media, you will see that to this day, millions are STILL asking these questions. What does that tell you?
jesusgrc1762 (Sunday 12th of October 2008 10:21:38 AM)
Yes, I have visited that site a long time ago. It systematically avoids the evidence and has no legitimate convincing proof of how wtc 7 collapsed. It uses NIST fantasy science, which they have changed from original causes (deisel fuel & wtc damage) to this new and more far fetched theory based on normal office fires causing "Thermal Expansion"??? Come on now. Translation: buildings collapse from plain ol fires.
jesusgrc1762 (Sunday 12th of October 2008 10:02:00 AM)
Coincidences PART 2: -fire has never brought down steel framed buildings -Marvin Bush & Wurt Walker III (Bush's brother & cousin), principals of scerurity co at WTC -Phillip Zelicow, (Bush-Cheney admin member & in Foreign Intel Advisory Board) is Exec Director of 911 Commission -editor in charge of the PM article was David Chartoff -FEMA in NYC Sept 10!! -war games by military staging hijacked planes on Sept 11 (Global Guardian, Northern Vigilance, Tripod 2)