US Government Censors Declaration of Independence

Back



http://www.screwcensorship.com YOU get to choose what I expose next; Go post under What to Expose Next? on the page located in the above link! This just in: The government has censored the declaration of independence! The hypocrisy of July 4th is astounding. The Text: Censoring the Declaration of Independence Every July 4th Americans celebrate a revolutionary document - The Declaration of Independence signed July 4th, 1776. The Declaration talks about the necessity "to dissolve the political bonds." About "unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Most radically of all it says "That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO ALTER OR ABOLISH IT, and to institute new government..." But some people don't want us to get that message... If you go to the Jefferson Memorial you will see that the engraving of the first lines of the Deceleration of Independence leaves out "the consent of the governed." and our "right to alter or abolish" government... Then there is this movie reading of the Declaration which closes the door to Independence hall just as we get to that important phrase... Don't let the government and the media censor the Declaration of Independence It's time to celebrate the Fourth of July for what it really is... "Right to Alter or Abolish the Government DAY!" A true people's holiday! To clarify: This video is pointing out that the government has forgotten the true values that our country was built on I cite specific examples where the government has gone AGAINST the people (such as the draft, or iraq war). If we vote for them and they go against the people then how is this a democracy? I am not saying that I am in support for a direct democracy or that I am a libertarian, I am simply saying that the government should remember that the government is "for the people by the people"

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: July 6, 2008 at 3:53 pm
Author: ScrewCensorship

Length: 0:03:33
Rating: 4.60
Views: 248,617

Tags: hypocrisy independence censored government censorship political commercial grassroots outreach news commentary analysis documentary gotcha!

Video Thumbnail #1:




Video Thumbnail #2:




Video Thumbnail #3:




Video Url:


Embed Code:


Video Comments:
RonFella (Friday 5th of September 2008 10:01:29 AM)
Wow dude you are the next Fox Mulder. LMAO!
freeamerica365 (Tuesday 2nd of September 2008 01:38:22 PM)
ScrewCensorship>>> great video and you did well..but , but if you did your home work well enough the d.o.i wasnt signed on the 4th of july it was aug. 2 1776
zardozcs (Tuesday 19th of August 2008 05:06:25 PM)
Raw land produces grass, which aint food. I bust my ass trying to get some vegetables to grow in my garden :-) Wheat was produced by man selectively breeding grass not nature. You don't have to tune your radio in to his frequency and you can't prevent the waves from entering your house anyway. (faraday cage excluded) But if you try to transmit on his established frequency you are interfering with his broadcast just as if you had gone into his garden and taken his vegetables.
zardozcs (Tuesday 19th of August 2008 12:58:58 PM)
HarcourtMarketing: 'french peoples followed suit' The French revolution was Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. Pursuit of happiness and property rights were not part of it. That's why the French revolution descended into the bloody beheading of anyone who owned land and then they had an Emperor who threw Europe into war. It is not the same calibre as the American Revolution at all. But yes, the Statue of Liberty is a gift from France. There is a smaller one in Paris.
zardozcs (Tuesday 19th of August 2008 12:47:47 PM)
JimboTHC "not free to start up" 2. It is interesting that you say the airwaves are 'loaned' to broadcasters. They ought to be private property with government's only role in enforcing property rights to prevent jamming etc. The airwaves didn't exist as a resource until the radio transmitter and receiver were INVENTED. Any given frequency rightfully belongs to the first person to operate a transmitter at that frequency. Just as land rights in America went to those who worked the land first.
JimboTHC (Tuesday 19th of August 2008 01:24:32 PM)
Just because you think the Airwaves "ought" to be private property doesn't mean they are. Your theories of how transmitters work is delusional. And your denial of monopoly by cable carriers and government regulation prohibiting a broadcasting license's or competition with a utility is intellectually dishonest.
zardozcs (Tuesday 19th of August 2008 01:54:06 PM)
JimboTHC: 1. obviously. 2. exactly how is it delusional? EM spectrum cannot be used for communication without a transmitter and a receiver. And they didn't exist until man made one. 3. Don't be so harsh here maybe I just don't know all the intricacies of the US broadcasting laws. But cable is different from airwaves, isn't it? Has the FCC closed all applications for new radio and tv licenses? If one had enough capital, couldn't they start a new broadcasting company? Can you use UHF?
JimboTHC (Tuesday 19th of August 2008 02:18:29 PM)
The spectrum has always existed, Nature produces all these signals in space. This is why we get transmissions from deep space all the time. Your argument is the equivalent of the guy who invented the sail owns the wind. UHF/VHF are going away with digital transition. 3)Your third question is based on you feigning ignorance, Thats not debating thats heckling.
zardozcs (Tuesday 19th of August 2008 03:16:14 PM)
Yes the spectrum existed but nature doesn't produce television shows and musical broadcasts. And we haven't had any great messages coming from deep space have we. Just as raw land doesn't produce wheat it takes human activity to make land and the airwaves productive. A man working on a plot of land owns the produce. A man transmitting on a frequency with a given range ought to own that frequency and territory.
zardozcs (Tuesday 19th of August 2008 03:20:20 PM)
The point of the video is that the US government has censored parts of the declaraion of independence. But it's only censored if you cannot communicate it in any form. And you can obviously communicate it without being arrested and thrown in prison. I grant that there is massive government interference in various forms of communication but it's not like China where you have blacked out regions broadcast on tv and books you cannot buy. And executions for speaking against the government.