The Clash - "Know Your Rights"

Back



Your Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest "Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary." Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: "Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed." "An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter." Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621. "When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified." Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1. "These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence." Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903. "An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery." (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260). "Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense." (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100). "One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance." (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910). "Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that 'a situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.' There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, 'If there be any remedy at all ... it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.' That was the 'ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.'" (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court. As for grounds for arrest: "The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace." (Wharton's Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197)

Channel: Music
Uploaded: March 27, 2006 at 2:00 am
Author: mikehated

Length: 0:04:52
Rating: 4.79
Views: 122,217

Tags: clash punk rock joe strummer riot protest cop police brutality anti war george bush

Video Thumbnail #1:




Video Thumbnail #2:




Video Thumbnail #3:




Video Url:


Embed Code:


Video Comments:
crazypainter72 (Sunday 28th of September 2008 03:32:42 PM)
our rights are being taking away from us little by little
BettinaMC (Wednesday 24th of September 2008 06:09:39 AM)
Brillant!
BettinaMC (Wednesday 24th of September 2008 06:04:29 AM)
that will be an awesome tattoo! :D
dakotahplaysguitar (Monday 8th of September 2008 05:09:14 PM)
2:11-1:45 Brixton right? Fucking figures
karlmarx71 (Monday 8th of September 2008 04:53:45 PM)
thanks for the video......its great to see even if it attracts the same old youtube morons who dont have anything to offer other than blinkered consumerist and capitalist crap or childish comments.......keep em coming brother. A great video accompanied by a great song.
venturasummer (Monday 8th of September 2008 12:07:17 PM)
thank the universe for kids like you!
venturasummer (Monday 8th of September 2008 11:58:22 AM)
amy goodman knows her rights!
poneil69 (Saturday 6th of September 2008 06:56:05 AM)
The Police are the strong arm of the law.God forgive them,I can't.
llamachang (Saturday 6th of September 2008 03:25:02 AM)
Yeah it is, its her favourite song apparently
dakotahplaysguitar (Tuesday 2nd of September 2008 09:06:30 PM)
woah, what the hell, of course! After actually listening to it, i couldn't really hear it but, it's about exactly what is happening in this video, police taking too much control and going corrupt with "their" rights