Flight 93 Did Not Crash In Pennsylvania!

Back



There is no evidence that Flight 93 simply crashed in Pennsylvania. Donald Rumsfeld actually says "shot down the plane", which may be a clue. However, at the site, there is no plane wreckage, no luggage, no people, no blood!? Eyewitnesses on video to confirm. Original television news alert saying that Flight 93 landed in Cleveland!?

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: August 3, 2007 at 1:42 pm
Author: tonybiviano

Length: 0:04:31
Rating: 4.44
Views: 112,898

Tags: WTC Flight 93 9/11 conspiracy september 11

Video Thumbnail #1:




Video Thumbnail #2:




Video Thumbnail #3:




Video Url:


Embed Code:


Video Comments:
shauny83 (Saturday 11th of October 2008 01:22:46 AM)
The plane was taken out by F14s cause they couldnt risk another WTC that would explain why there was fuck all left of it
brian78045 (Friday 10th of October 2008 04:13:30 PM)
Theres an interesting article on Flight 93 at DNotice (org) titled "One Of Our Aircraft Isn't Missing". It has some new research.
koolbossjock (Thursday 9th of October 2008 02:09:57 PM)
Dumbsfeld is an asshole.8 mile debri field??? Not unless it was blown out of the sky as in Lockerbie or the DHL and the Bashkirian Mid air crash back in 2002.Try again Federal Butchers of Investigation aka FBI.
MuTheta9 (Monday 6th of October 2008 09:07:30 PM)
that was a different flight. that was united 89, not american 93. that one kid needs to check his facts, on which plane is which.
MuTheta9 (Monday 6th of October 2008 09:10:32 PM)
i have that wrong, it was Delta 89 that actually landed in Cleveland, not United 93
gemriderz (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:30:32 PM)
Someone asks; "Give me one reason why the Government would do this"!? I'll give you several; 1. The US sinks it's OWN vessel, the USS Maine, in Havana, which begins the Spanish/American war. 2. The US is warned by Germany - repeatedly - not to send weapons and ammo aboard passenger liners. The Lusitania is sunk, we enter WWI.
gemriderz (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:29:55 PM)
3. On Dec 3, 1941, the Aus. Coast Guard warns the US, of a large, Japanese fleet headed towards Hawaii. We are 'surprised' by the attack 4 days later, and enter WW2. 4. Vietnamese gunboats attack a US warship, Gulf of Tonkin, resulting in the Tonkin Resolution which authorizes US troops to Vietnam. Only problem was, never were any gunboats, there never was any attack, and the skipper confirmed this. A hoax to enter a war.
gemriderz (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:13:08 PM)
9/11. We needed a new enemy, and within 30 minutes, Dan Rathers guest that morning, just HAPPENED to be a White House anti-terror specialist advisor, was announcing this was a terrorist act, and OBL was responsible. 30 MINUTES AFTER THE ATTACKS BEGAN. How did he get all this info? One would have to be rather dense to actually BELIEVE their story. The evidence is overwhelming. Its all there if you stop waving the flag and go read - and stop accepting what you're told.
gemriderz (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:07:57 PM)
PS. Did you know WTCs new owner bought the building at Junk Status, insured it for billions against terrorists acts, made 3 ATTEMPTS to demo the building, but was turned down by the Port Authority due to asbestos content? He then sued the insurance company claiming 2 SEPARATE ACTS, and was awarded almost double his policy
mukkohaha (Thursday 9th of October 2008 06:26:31 PM)
Gemiriderz, it dont mather if even half of that is the truth, they are so corrupt that they have done worse things we just dont know about. the rabbit holes go further down then we see. This is a global conspiracy, witch involves the New world order - Illuminati - Freemasonry. listen to George Herbert walker bush's speech 9/11 1991 10 years before. search that :P plz reply mr. gemriderz