Lyrics

lijebaley01 (Monday 6th of October 2008 03:06:42 PM)

wake, 16 witnesses quoted as saying they saw light poles/post knocked down by the plane here: h t t p ://mouv4x8. club. fr/11Sept01/A0082_b_They%20saw%20the%20aircraft. htm

cdddraffsman (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:51:18 PM)

jizzmonger It's impossible that the north of Citgo plane is the lamp pole plane, the new FAA has finally proven this. Try to explain how a plane travelling 100 yards south of the lamp poles, can fly north of Citgo. Try to explain how a plane flying north of Citgo can hit the lamp posts 100 yard further south. try at least...jizz

KonradAdenauer (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:51:04 PM)

Cuz I can ford a red eed only street a wide a ree land. Die-mond make a mid-evil bike a sake a like a ree caste. Cuz I can ford a red eed only street a wide a ree land. On a ree land. Find a ree land. IT'S ALL PROVEN!!!

DiegoBazinZamora (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:26:35 PM)

they say there is no evidence of a plane , and the FBI covers all the camera and security pictures and videos by order of BUSH!!

wakenbake22 (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:18:10 PM)

jizz You keep saying I use drugs, because of my screenname. So if I was neverwrong22 you would believe everything I say? Also, you call eyewitness testimony by two police officers "hearsay" and "conjecture" but call me a druggie based on what evidence? The damage at the Pentagon doesn't match a 757, so the physical evidence, including the lack of ground structure damage proves a new investigation is needed. Where is your evidence that flight 77 hit the light poles. Conjecture? Hearsay?

jizzmonger (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:20:57 PM)

I want you to tell me, in your own words what you think heresay and conjecture are. Don't google it. Just assure the rest of us that you know what they are. Then I want you tell us why you think your assertions are NOT heresay and conjecture.

wakenbake22 (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:31:30 PM)

jizz I am not trying to convict anyone in a trial. I am only demanding a new investigation, or solid evidence that proves flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, and an official flight path that explains all the anomalies.

wakenbake22 (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:34:28 PM)

Sgt Lagasse is on video at the Citgo station. His location is confirmed. He can not see through the building. He can only see the plane if it flies on the north side of Citgo. He can barely see the Pentagon's first floor from the Citgo gas pump. He admits to flinching when seeing the plane, to have only seen the plane for a second, and to diving into his car out of fear. Yet, you think he clearly sees the plane hit, but is wrong about seeing it north of Citgo?

jizzmonger (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:51:32 PM)

There is solid evidence, you just choose to ignore it and instead place more relevance on heresay and conjecture (two words which you do not know the meaning of).

wakenbake22 (Monday 6th of October 2008 01:21:33 PM)

The damage to the cab, traveling 40 mphs and struck with light pole 1 (stopping the cab right where light pole 1 had stood) doesn't match the large part of the pole sticking into the cab (as England states, it wasn't a piece from the top, it was the large pole), no damage to the dash, minor damage to the front seat and windshield, no damage to the hood.